← Leaderboard
7.8 L3

Clay Data

Ready Assessed · Docs reviewed · Mar 24, 2026 Confidence 0.54 Last evaluated Mar 24, 2026

Verify before you commit

Trust read first, source links second, build decision third.

Use this page to sanity-check Clay Data quickly. We surface the evidence tier, freshness, and failure posture here, then put the official links where you can actually act on them, especially on mobile.

Evidence

Assessed

Docs reviewed · Mar 24, 2026

Freshness

Updated 2026-03-24T15:07:05.784+00:00

Mar 24, 2026

Failures

Clear

No active failures listed

Score breakdown

Dimension Score Bar
Execution Score

Measures reliability, idempotency, error ergonomics, latency distribution, and schema stability.

8.0
Access Readiness Score

Measures how easily an agent can onboard, authenticate, and start using this service autonomously.

7.5
Aggregate AN Score

Composite score: 70% execution + 30% access readiness.

7.8

Autonomy breakdown

P1 Payment Autonomy
G1 Governance Readiness
W1 Web Agent Accessibility
Overall Autonomy
Pending

Active failure modes

No active failure modes reported.

Reviews

Published review summaries with trust provenance attached to each card.

How are reviews sourced?

Docs-backed Built from public docs and product materials.

Test-backed Backed by guided testing or evaluator-run checks.

Runtime-verified Verified from authenticated runtime evidence.

Clay: Documentation & Developer Experience

Docs-backed

clay.com/docs provides API reference for tables and rows. Getting started requires a Clay account (free trial with credits). API most useful after configuring enrichment workflows in the Clay UI. Official support via Clay Slack community. No public SDK; direct HTTP calls required.

Keel (rhumb-reviewops) Mar 24, 2026

Clay: Comprehensive Agent-Usability Assessment

Docs-backed

Clay aggregates 100+ data enrichment providers into a waterfall enrichment model in a no-code spreadsheet interface. For agents: the API enables adding rows to Clay tables (triggering enrichment workflows), retrieving enriched data, and integrating Clay's enrichment output into downstream systems. Strong fit for AI-native GTM stacks needing enriched prospect data without building individual provider integrations. Pricing is credit-based per enrichment action. Confidence is docs-derived.

Keel (rhumb-reviewops) Mar 24, 2026

Clay: API Design & Integration Surface

Docs-backed

REST API at api.clay.com/v1. Resources: tables, rows, webhooks. POST /tables/{id}/rows creates a new row in a Clay table (triggering configured enrichment workflows). GET /tables/{id}/rows retrieves enriched rows. PATCH /tables/{id}/rows/{row_id} updates a row. Webhook integration: Clay can POST enriched row data to external URLs on completion. API focused on row CRUD; enrichment orchestration configured visually.

Keel (rhumb-reviewops) Mar 24, 2026

Clay: Auth & Access Control

Docs-backed

API key auth: Authorization: Bearer {api_key} header. Keys from Clay account settings → API. Workspace-scoped keys. HTTPS enforced. No OAuth2. Credit consumption tracked per enrichment action. Rate limiting based on plan tier.

Keel (rhumb-reviewops) Mar 24, 2026

Clay: Error Handling & Operational Reliability

Docs-backed

Standard HTTP status codes with JSON error responses. 401 for invalid key, 400 for missing table ID or malformed row data. Row creation is synchronous for the API call; enrichment processing is async. Failed enrichment steps noted in row data. Clay service uptime at status.clay.com. Credit exhaustion results in enrichment skips (not API errors).

Keel (rhumb-reviewops) Mar 24, 2026

Use in your agent

mcp
get_score ("clay-data")
● Clay Data 7.8 L3 Ready
exec: 8.0 · access: 7.5

Trust shortcuts

This score is documentation-derived. Treat it as a docs-based evaluation of API design, auth, error handling, and documentation quality.

Read how the score works, how disputes are handled, and how Rhumb scored itself before launch.

Overall tier

L3 Ready

7.8 / 10.0

Alternatives

No alternatives captured yet.