← Leaderboard
7.0 L3

Codacy

Ready Assessed · Docs reviewed · Mar 21, 2026 Confidence 0.51 Last evaluated Mar 21, 2026

Verify before you commit

Trust read first, source links second, build decision third.

Use this page to sanity-check Codacy quickly. We surface the evidence tier, freshness, and failure posture here, then put the official links where you can actually act on them, especially on mobile.

Evidence

Assessed

Docs reviewed · Mar 21, 2026

Freshness

Updated 2026-03-21T00:41:48.017943+00:00

Mar 21, 2026

Failures

Clear

No active failures listed

Score breakdown

Dimension Score Bar
Execution Score

Measures reliability, idempotency, error ergonomics, latency distribution, and schema stability.

7.2
Access Readiness Score

Measures how easily an agent can onboard, authenticate, and start using this service autonomously.

6.7
Aggregate AN Score

Composite score: 70% execution + 30% access readiness.

7.0

Autonomy breakdown

P1 Payment Autonomy
G1 Governance Readiness
W1 Web Agent Accessibility
Overall Autonomy
Pending

Active failure modes

No active failure modes reported.

Reviews

Published review summaries with trust provenance attached to each card.

How are reviews sourced?

Docs-backed Built from public docs and product materials.

Test-backed Backed by guided testing or evaluator-run checks.

Runtime-verified Verified from authenticated runtime evidence.

Codacy: Comprehensive Agent-Usability Assessment

Docs-backed

Codacy is an automated code review platform with broad language support (40+ languages) and integrated security analysis, distinguishing it from Code Climate's quality-first focus. For agents managing codebases across multiple programming languages, Codacy's breadth reduces the need for separate security scanning and quality tools. The API enables agents to retrieve quality gate results, security issue counts, and coverage data for automated quality enforcement workflows.

Rhumb editorial team Mar 21, 2026

Codacy: API Design & Integration Surface

Docs-backed

The API covers repositories, issues, metrics, quality settings, and pull request analysis. The quality gate API is the primary agent integration surface — agents can evaluate whether a repository or pull request meets configured quality thresholds across coverage, issue count, and security vulnerability dimensions. The combined security and quality view in a single API reduces integration complexity for teams wanting both in one tool.

Rhumb editorial team Mar 21, 2026

Codacy: Auth & Access Control

Docs-backed

Authentication uses API tokens generated from account settings. The token model is straightforward for CI/CD automation. Teams should use project-scoped tokens where possible to limit the blast radius of credential exposure.

Rhumb editorial team Mar 21, 2026

Codacy: Error Handling & Operational Reliability

Docs-backed

Reliability is appropriate for a production code quality service. Analysis processing is asynchronous following code pushes, with similar timing considerations to Code Climate. Agents gating on Codacy analysis results should implement polling or webhook-based patterns to synchronize with analysis completion rather than assuming real-time availability of results.

Rhumb editorial team Mar 21, 2026

Codacy: Documentation & Developer Experience

Docs-backed

Documentation covers the API surface with adequate depth for the primary use cases. Teams evaluating Codacy for its security analysis integration will find the issue categorization documentation useful for understanding how security vulnerabilities are classified relative to code quality issues.

Rhumb editorial team Mar 21, 2026

Use in your agent

mcp
get_score ("codacy")
● Codacy 7.0 L3 Ready
exec: 7.2 · access: 6.7

Trust shortcuts

This score is documentation-derived. Treat it as a docs-based evaluation of API design, auth, error handling, and documentation quality.

Read how the score works, how disputes are handled, and how Rhumb scored itself before launch.

Overall tier

L3 Ready

7.0 / 10.0

Alternatives

No alternatives captured yet.