← Leaderboard
8.0 L4

Hunter

Native Assessed · Docs reviewed · Mar 16, 2026 Confidence 0.55 Last evaluated Mar 16, 2026

Scores 8.0/10 overall. with execution at 8.2 and access readiness at 7.7.

Verify before you commit

Trust read first, source links second, build decision third.

Use this page to sanity-check Hunter quickly. We surface the evidence tier, freshness, and failure posture here, then put the official links where you can actually act on them, especially on mobile.

Evidence

Assessed

Docs reviewed · Mar 16, 2026

Freshness

Updated 2026-03-16T05:26:18.05278+00:00

Mar 16, 2026

Failures

Clear

No active failures listed

Score breakdown

Dimension Score Bar
Execution Score

Measures reliability, idempotency, error ergonomics, latency distribution, and schema stability.

8.2
Access Readiness Score

Measures how easily an agent can onboard, authenticate, and start using this service autonomously.

7.7
Aggregate AN Score

Composite score: 70% execution + 30% access readiness.

8.0

Autonomy breakdown

P1 Payment Autonomy
G1 Governance Readiness
W1 Web Agent Accessibility
Overall Autonomy
Pending

Active failure modes

No active failure modes reported.

Reviews

Published review summaries with trust provenance attached to each card.

How are reviews sourced?

Docs-backed Built from public docs and product materials.

Test-backed Backed by guided testing or evaluator-run checks.

Runtime-verified Verified from authenticated runtime evidence.

Hunter.io: Comprehensive Agent-Usability Assessment

Docs-backed

Hunter.io is narrowly focused on email finding and verification — it does this well and doesn't try to be a full enrichment platform. The three core APIs are Domain Search (find email addresses associated with a domain), Email Finder (find a specific person's email given name + domain), and Email Verifier (validate an email address). For agents, this focused scope is valuable when the specific need is email discovery or verification rather than full contact enrichment. The free tier (25 searches/month) enables testing. The data source is primarily web-crawled and pattern-inferred email addresses. Agents building outreach automation, CRM enrichment, or contact verification workflows find Hunter's API straightforward to integrate. The limitation: it's email-only — no phone numbers, no firmographic data, no intent signals.

Rhumb editorial team Mar 16, 2026

Hunter.io: Auth & Credit Management

Docs-backed

API key authentication via api_key query parameter. Keys are generated in the Hunter.io dashboard. One key per account with full API access — no scoping. No OAuth for third-party apps. Free tier provides 25 requests/month; paid plans scale up. Each API operation consumes one credit (domain search, email find, or email verification). Agents must track credit consumption to avoid exhaustion. The API returns remaining credits in the X-RateLimit-Remaining header. No temporary credentials or key rotation mechanism. For agents, the main consideration is credit budgeting: agents processing many contacts should estimate credit needs against their plan. Bulk verification is more credit-efficient than individual calls for large lists.

Rhumb editorial team Mar 16, 2026

Hunter.io: Documentation & Integration Speed

Docs-backed

API documentation at hunter.io/api-documentation/v2 is clean, complete, and easy to navigate. Every endpoint is documented with parameters, response examples, and error codes. The documentation includes a Google Sheets add-on guide for non-developer access. Client libraries exist for Python (pyhunter), Node, Ruby, Go, and PHP — mostly community-maintained. The API's simplicity means the documentation surface is small and digestible — agents can read the entire API reference in 15 minutes. Integration guides for CRM platforms and Zapier provide no-code alternatives. The documentation accurately represents the API's scope — no feature inflation. For agents with email-specific needs, Hunter's focused documentation enables the fastest path from reading to production of any enrichment API.

Rhumb editorial team Mar 16, 2026

Hunter.io: API Design & Email Operations

Docs-backed

REST API at api.hunter.io/v2/ with clean GET-based endpoints. Domain Search: GET /domain-search?domain={domain} returns email addresses, patterns, and department information. Email Finder: GET /email-finder?domain={domain}&first_name={name}&last_name={name} returns the most likely email and confidence score. Email Verifier: GET /email-verifier?email={email} returns deliverability status (valid, invalid, accept_all, unknown), MX record verification, and format validation. Response payloads are clean JSON with confidence scores. The API design is REST-idiomatic: GET for reads, POST for bulk operations. Bulk verification accepts CSV upload for batch processing. Account endpoint returns credit balance. The API surface is small and well-designed — agents can integrate all three endpoints in an hour.

Rhumb editorial team Mar 16, 2026

Hunter.io: Error Handling & Verification Accuracy

Docs-backed

API errors return JSON with errors[] array containing id, code, and detail fields. Error codes are descriptive: invalid_api_key, missing_parameter, rate_limit_exceeded. Rate limits are per-second (10 requests/second for most plans). The Email Verifier returns a confidence score and status — agents should handle 'accept_all' and 'unknown' statuses appropriately (accept_all means the server accepts any email, not that the specific address exists). Email Finder confidence scores range from 0-100 — agents should set a minimum confidence threshold for usability. Domain Search may return 0 results for small or privacy-focused companies. The API is reliable and predictable — errors are clear, and the scope is narrow enough that edge cases are well-understood.

Rhumb editorial team Mar 16, 2026

Use in your agent

mcp
get_score ("hunter")
● Hunter 8.0 L4 Native
exec: 8.2 · access: 7.7

Trust shortcuts

This score is documentation-derived. Treat it as a docs-based evaluation of API design, auth, error handling, and documentation quality.

Read how the score works, how disputes are handled, and how Rhumb scored itself before launch.

Overall tier

L4 Native

8.0 / 10.0

Alternatives

No alternatives captured yet.