← Leaderboard
6.9 L2

Terrateam

Ready Assessed · Docs reviewed · Mar 21, 2026 Confidence 0.50 Last evaluated Mar 21, 2026

Verify before you commit

Trust read first, source links second, build decision third.

Use this page to sanity-check Terrateam quickly. We surface the evidence tier, freshness, and failure posture here, then put the official links where you can actually act on them, especially on mobile.

Evidence

Assessed

Docs reviewed · Mar 21, 2026

Freshness

Updated 2026-03-21T01:41:53.310836+00:00

Mar 21, 2026

Failures

Clear

No active failures listed

Score breakdown

Dimension Score Bar
Execution Score

Measures reliability, idempotency, error ergonomics, latency distribution, and schema stability.

7.1
Access Readiness Score

Measures how easily an agent can onboard, authenticate, and start using this service autonomously.

6.6
Aggregate AN Score

Composite score: 70% execution + 30% access readiness.

6.9

Autonomy breakdown

P1 Payment Autonomy
G1 Governance Readiness
W1 Web Agent Accessibility
Overall Autonomy
Pending

Active failure modes

No active failure modes reported.

Reviews

Published review summaries with trust provenance attached to each card.

How are reviews sourced?

Docs-backed Built from public docs and product materials.

Test-backed Backed by guided testing or evaluator-run checks.

Runtime-verified Verified from authenticated runtime evidence.

Terrateam: Comprehensive Agent-Usability Assessment

Docs-backed

Terrateam is a GitHub-native Terraform automation service that runs Terraform plans and applies through pull request comments, keeping infrastructure changes inside the normal code review workflow. When a PR touches Terraform configuration, Terrateam automatically runs a plan and posts the output as a PR comment; an apply is triggered by an authorized comment once the plan is reviewed. For agents operating in GitHub-native infrastructure workflows — reviewing PRs, checking plan outputs, or monitoring deployment status — Terrateam surfaces infrastructure change information in the GitHub context.

Rhumb editorial team Mar 21, 2026

Terrateam: Auth & Access Control

Docs-backed

Authentication is handled through GitHub app permissions rather than separate API credentials. Terrateam's access to repository Terraform configurations is controlled by the GitHub app installation scope. Teams using Terrateam primarily manage access through GitHub team permissions and the Terrateam configuration file rather than a separate credential system.

Rhumb editorial team Mar 21, 2026

Terrateam: Documentation & Developer Experience

Docs-backed

Documentation covers setup and configuration clearly. The workflow model (plan-on-PR, apply-on-comment) is well-explained. Teams evaluating Terrateam for GitHub-native Terraform workflows will find the documentation approachable, though the integration surface is narrower than Spacelift for complex automation use cases.

Rhumb editorial team Mar 21, 2026

Terrateam: API Design & Integration Surface

Docs-backed

Integration is primarily through GitHub PR events and comments rather than a comprehensive REST API. Terrateam's configuration is managed through a `.terrateam/config.yml` in the repository. Agents interacting with Terrateam infrastructure workflows primarily do so through the GitHub API (reading PR comments for plan output, triggering applies via comment). Direct Terrateam API capabilities are more limited than Spacelift or Atlantis for programmatic workflow control.

Rhumb editorial team Mar 21, 2026

Terrateam: Error Handling & Operational Reliability

Docs-backed

Reliability is appropriate for a GitHub-integrated infrastructure automation service. Terrateam runs infrastructure plans in response to GitHub webhooks, which introduces dependency on both GitHub availability and Terrateam's webhook processing. Teams relying on Terrateam for production infrastructure changes should have a fallback procedure for running Terraform manually during service interruptions.

Rhumb editorial team Mar 21, 2026

Use in your agent

mcp
get_score ("terrateam")
● Terrateam 6.9 L3 Ready
exec: 7.1 · access: 6.6

Trust shortcuts

This score is documentation-derived. Treat it as a docs-based evaluation of API design, auth, error handling, and documentation quality.

Read how the score works, how disputes are handled, and how Rhumb scored itself before launch.

Overall tier

L3 Ready

6.9 / 10.0

Alternatives

No alternatives captured yet.